Hi Barbara
I'm with you re that I eventually find composite charts baffling.
Am guessing that the intial composite chart is the relationship when it begins?
The progressed composite chart shows how the relationship is likely to progress?
ie Get better or worse ?
I also don't understand the difference in the mid point composite chart method and the Davidson method,
as the charts I've looked at vary greatly with those two methods.
Sue
The whole thing works on three levels:
1. First of all you need to look at the
duad charts as these give the initial attraction and are probably genetically based. The
draconic charts probably show 'soul' connections as they are based on the nodal axis.
You don't need many connections in either of these charts, but you do need two or three good strong ones to set the rest of the relationship in motion.
2. If these criteria show connections, then the
synastry kicks in. This tends to show how you get on with each other and the areas of mutual exchange in each horoscope. Without the above prerequisites the synastry doesn't have any power, so you can have a lovely Sun-Moon, Venus-Mars etc., but no oomph to it.
I remember in my early years as an astrologer a fellow astrologer showed me our synastry - it was wonderful, but I felt no attraction to him at all other than friendship. Then I met my chiropractor and we had a fantastic double Sun-Moon conjunction and a strong Venus-Mars connection. I really liked my chiropractor but felt no interest in him in a sexual or relationship sense. This truly puzzled me and I determined to find out why such powerful synastries didn't click for me. When I discovered the duad system I realised why - both men didn't fit any of my duad requirements.
3. Once the relationship is formed, then the
composite , which is the midpoint of each of the two pairs of planets e.g. Sun-Sun, Moon-Moon etc., and the
Davison, which is the half way point between the two dates, times and places of birth, become very effective.
These describe the relationship as an entity within itself.
Both these systems respond to transits. For example, one of my friends and I have a lovely Sun-Venus conjunct in Pisces in the 5th house in the composite chart. The friendship was very harmonious for many, many years, but once Pluto and Uranus started their transits over this placement problems started to occur. Now I hardly ever see her.
The Davison chart strongly responds to progressions and directions. In 1994 I ran a Relationship Course in Sydney which lasted for 6 months and had a number of attendees. As part of their homework I asked them to run a progressed chart for the time they met a person who was important to them. Every one of these people turned up to the next class showing the Davison chart giving clear indictations of the time they met - and the time of their first sexual encounter!
If there is a divorce the progressed or directed Davison chart clearly shows this... and so on.
Of the two I think the Davison is probably the stronger.
Without understanding the three levels of a relationship I don't think there is a truly clear picture of its dynamics.
Alice McDermott