In the first chart, Philly the favorite is given the first house and Toronto is given the 7th. Note Uranus exactly on the 7th Cusp, orb 7'.
This single chart only would suggest that Toronto would UPSET Philly. They didn't they lost 1-0 in a shoot out. Therefore a static single chart leads to ERROR.
The main problem is, single charts DON'T lead to error...It just that you don't know how to properly interpret them ?
Besides, PLANETS, aspects, and horary charts NEVER MAKE ERRORS...it's WE HUMANS (astrologers?) WHO ERR...
So, you are saying that Toronto would upset Philadelphia, based
solely on a peregrinated URANUS ?
Fine, you are entitled to your opinion....But...
I would NEVER read the chart, that way, and neither would the late Llewellyn George !
If you use the traditional aspects properly, Philadelphia is clearly slated to win...That is a no-brainer...
NOBODY EVER bases an UPSET WIN on ONE single aspect, alone ! You need to look at the WHOLE chart, Halina, whenever making sports predictions ! I have told you about this over and over, but you still make the same silly mistakes...
I think that it's well and good that you quote from John Frawley (Frawley is obviously your hero?).
You should also know that Frawley has his critics, too ? In some of his books, he gets too preoccupied with these long rants in which he knocks the systems of other astrologers... He comes across as very arrogant, actually ?
Frankly, does anyone give a crap what he thinks of other astrologers ? Just stick to the astrology, buddy...
It is the same deal with Basil Fearrington. publicly denigrading Ann Coulter...calling her 'a moron,' because she happens to have natal Jupiter square Neptune... This type of negative astrology drives people away from the artform ?
Noel Tyl has performed dozens and dozens of chart analyses for notorious historical figures, like Hitler, Mussolini, and others, people perhaps far more evil than Coulter.. ?
Never ONCE has Noel publicly slammed these figures... Wisely, he never interprets the planets based on his own political bias... He leaves that out of the interpretation and lets history and the READER decide... who is truly EVIL or not EVIL ?
If Basil wants to see how natal analysis should be really done, he should follow the good work of his own Master...
Meanwhile, Halina, you should strive to interpret the horary chart, properly, and without bias ? I don't care if you use a hundred charts to predict a sports win.... Sometimes, I think that you have an impatient, " Mars like" side to you that is rather sloppy on details and makes very quick judgements based on fallacy...or your own likes and dislikes...
There is no rush to read these charts, Halina ! Slow down ! LOL
R.J. Smith